Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Currently, an increasing number of people are concerned about the fact that many people choose the internet to communicate although it is an important one instead of meeting at the conference room or a hall. However, whether it has more benefits to compare with disadvantages is a debatable issue. My view is that communicate through a small screen can give people a great win-win outcome. Reasons are as follows.
First, it is obvious that having a conversation online can save people money. This means that, individuals work not only in their area but also out of town or country. However, moving always cost citizens a considerable amount of money with a lot of things from transportation to accommodation. So, it is convenient that people can meet others without moving and costing money.
Moreover, meetings or discussions which happened online can be occurred wherever and whenever. For example, I had an online English class with my teacher who lives in America. We could talk together whenever we were free, although it was at home or in the park. I could learn a lot from her and I found it was more convenient than go to the class because the time was freedom and the place too.
That is not to say that meeting online not has disadvantages. Of course, when working online, people cannot see their coworker clearly to believe in them to cooperate with. But I think if we decided to work with somebody, we should know about that person thoroughly.
In conclusion, online communicating can has both of advantages and disadvantages, however, the benefits of it are greater than the opposite side.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-02 | wardiati | 67 | view |
2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
2019-11-24 | Tt617 | 84 | view |
2019-10-21 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
2019-10-20 | phanduydat | 11 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are play in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individuals sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 to 2004 in five European countries 61
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You s 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sadvantages, however, the benefits of it are greater than the opposite side.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85338345702 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2801934027 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5625 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0740294016713 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277763043961 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419060479239 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438324052902 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028865694025 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.