Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts
As one of the phenomenon of the 21st century, traditional does not play an essential role as it used to be in the past. There is an increasing number of family losing the tradition of eating meals together. In this essay, I intend to explore the sources of this problem along with the detrimental impacts on individuals and society.
Chief among the causes of this problem is the modern lifestyle. Firstly, nowadays, family members typically work and study with different schedule. Consequently, they are unable to go home at the same time to have meals together. Secondly, the intense amount of work is also made a huge impact on this change of families' eating tradition. Recently, people often go home late because there are plenty of work they have to deal with, then, their choices usually is buying foods online or from the convinient stores and eat while they are doing their works. Another contributing factor is the apperance of the internet. For instance, many youngsters spend their huge time on browsing the internet and actively involving in social media websites. Thus, they tend to have meals in their leisure time.
This tradition conversion has caused several issues both in society and families. Since people no longer gather for meals, they do not have chance to tell their daily stories. It is unsurprising that the bond between them will be faded by time. Therefore, the understanding between parents and their children will be limitedand eventually parents no longer undertand their children, which would create conflicts. Little wonder that the disapearance of this tradition will make a huge imoact on the society. Many youth do not feel it is necessary to organize a family for their own so this tradition might be forgotten in the future.
In conclusion, due to the high volume of workload of parents and students, lots of family do not have enough time to enjoy meals together by various reasons This has several effects on both families and societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-30 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 to 2004 in five European countries 61
- Age structure of country X in 3 years 1950 2000 2050 89
- Task 2 The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 93
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun youth seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many youths'.
Suggestion: Many youths
...will make a huge imoact on the society. Many youth do not feel it is necessary to organize...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60631122081 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4991703099 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149755333444 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499618791224 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587489347993 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108522709619 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434476815866 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.