The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdow Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of survey asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The given charts compare and contrast the differences in the number of visitors of the Ashdow Museum and their opinions about the museum in two different years before and after the museum was redecorated.
In general, Ashdow Museum had a successful refurbished in order to make a win-win situation.
It can be seen that, the year before renewed, museum was visited by 74000 visitors. However, the number of people who dissatisfied was dramatic high (40%). Followed by a vast amount of individuals satisfied whith the museum, which was 30%. Whereas in contrast, people who were very satisfied was considerable low (15%). The proportion of citizens who were very dissatisfied and who had no response were the lowest, they were 10% and 5% respectively.
After the refurbishment, there was a huge change in satisfaction of visitors. The number of people satisfied with Ashdow Museum was climbed to 40% and became the highest. Additionally, there was a dramatic increase in the very satisfied response (35%). The negative opinions were reduced, visitors who were dissatisfied and very dissatisfied were declined to 15% and 5% respectively, while the proportion of no response was remained the same at 5%.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Task 2 The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 93
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 73
- Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 11
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20103092784 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98556861223 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.990297216 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29428041121 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113692810679 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746320260114 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183390211999 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933824580999 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.