Age structure of country X in 3 years 1950, 2000, 2050
These three pie charts compare and contrast some stricking differences in age structure of demographic of country X in three different years 1950, 2000 and 2050. There are four age groups, namely older than 65 years old, under 20 years old, 20 to 40 yearsnold and 41 to 65 years old.
In general, while the ratio for the two younger groups is tend to fall, the older groups will be likely to increase sharply.
It can be seen that, in the year 1950, it was 53% of people who under 20. However, 50 years after, this group declined slightly to 34% and it is predicted to fall dramatically to 14% in 2050. The second biggest population in 1950 was the group of people between 20 to 40 years old, it reached 27%. In 2000, this proportion rose steadily to 28% and forcasted to decrease to 18% over 50 years. The older groups climbed considerably in 1950 to 2000 period. Two of these groups are predicted to increase tremendously in 50 years to come, they will be 33% and 35%, respectively.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- Age structure of country X in 3 years 1950 2000 2050 89
- Task 2 The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 93
- Task 2: The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 11
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...the ratio for the two younger groups is tend to fall, the older groups will be likel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50555555556 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50635611748 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0941978105 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35151262833 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134041658265 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114386361016 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205419598429 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163528909039 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.