Environment is always a greatly sensible issues that people have an controversial argument with each other. It is believed that responsibility of resolving serious environmental degradation should belong to a global organization instead of a internal government. From my point of view, I totally disagree with this state.
Environment is always a greatly sensible issues that people have an controversial argument with each other. It is believed that responsibility of resolving serious environmental degradation should belong to a global organization instead of a internal government. From my point of view, I totally disagree with this state.
Global organization is not able to expend their potential due to their lack of permission relating to environmental protection laws which is absolutely declared by domestic government. What I am trying to emphasize is that international organization do not have privilege to make decision about an issue without the approval of national government. Besides, internal government often work with large business which mainly contribute to environmental deterioration and do not have any waste water treatment before releasing waste water into rivers or ponds by providing strict punishment to them or forbid mass production forever. Moreover, internal government always conduct environmental monitoring and present some measure for each specific situation more precisely and effectively than global organization since they know very well each regions. Therefore, they have enough proof to add more green tax policies when companies using unrenewable resources and have detrimental impact on environment to ensure strong financial support for accidental problems anticipated in the future.
I strongly believe that there will be more effective impact if global organization co-operate with internal government in curb environmental deterioration. What I mean is global groups are often reputable which is helpful to raise public’s ecological consciousness by propagating benefits when using public transports instead of using cars which exhaust fumes negatively affecting air quality, reduce dependence on fossil fuel and carbon footprint. As a result, different authorities undertake to reduce emission from using fossil fuel in manufacture and the environmental problems can easily eliminated.
In conclusion, I insist that national government should be responsible for their own country’s environment with a necessary support from international government.
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world. 78
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. 56
- People attend college or university for many different reasons . Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in thousand in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76158940397 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3897101168 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3083911311 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374105175054 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210866321477 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.29388531946 0.0843802449381 348% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317968960041 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.348783384012 0.0819641961636 426% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.