The table below shows the number of women in ford motor company s head office in detroit

Essay topics:

The table below shows the number of women in ford motor company 's head office in detroit.

The given table depits the information of different types of work such as manager, deputy manager and supervisor in motor company 's head office detrol from 2000 to 2006 it is clear and coherent representation

It can be seen that, it is lucid in 2000 number of women in working as a manager 6 percent but 4 percent increase in deputy manager, which is working supervisor was declined 1 percent and working only 9 percent next year 2002 manager working on 9 percent next deputy manager working increase by 4 percent was 13 percent between supervisor working declined only 12 percentage year 2004 working in manager part on 13 percent but deputy manager work was increased by 2 percent which is 15 percentage next supervisor work on 21 percent and highest year 2006 manager work 16 percent and deputy manager work was increased on 3 percent which is 19 percent and supervisor work 22 percent

Votes
Average: 3.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-07 Mani mahendru 35 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is clear and coherent representation It can be seen that, it is lucid in 2000...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of women in working as a manager 6 percent but 4 percent increase in depu...
^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isor working declined only 12 percentage year 2004 working in manager part on 13 ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76129032258 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63983728569 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464516129032 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 155.0 22.4926829268 689% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 738.0 112.824112599 654% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 155.0 22.9334400587 676% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 20.0 5.23603664747 382% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0496379200904 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496379200904 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971884801335 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837572116637 0.0819641961636 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 78.5 13.2329268293 593% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -68.93 61.2550243902 -113% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 61.4 10.3012195122 596% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 13.06 8.06136585366 162% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.0 10.9970731707 582% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.