Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether the government should reduce their investment in art, music, and painting. This has elicited a stimulated disputation among the public. Whereas some people say that the government should reduce the investment in the art, music, and painting, I believe that the government should not. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, conspicuously, There are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reason is that investment in art, music, and painting is necessary to maintain to cultural values. Another cogent reason is that it encourages the artists. Moreover, for any country, it is necessary to maintain its cultural values, and government can achieve it by investing in the art, music, and painting.
On the contrary, there are skeptics who conjecture that investing in Art, Music, and painting is a waste of money and the government should rather invest in the scientific research. Although it seems ostensibly veridical this is not the case as investing in art, music, and painting is equally important to maintain the country's cultural value.
After analyzing the above facts I would like to recapitulate that, as with investment in arts, music and painting helps the country improve its cultural value, hence the investment should not be reduced.
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. 77
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transaction, without meeting other people face to face. what are the effects on induvidual and society as a whole? 55
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 72
- As people become increasingly more dependent on motorcars, the public transport systems tend to run down. This has serious consequences on both the existing community and the new communities, which are spreading farther and farther from town centres.Suppo 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25106382979 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74686042438 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9231162393 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371243270199 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151788301494 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138232632908 0.071462118173 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221573658365 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766263302608 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.