The line graph provides information on the number of birth and death rates in European country between 1950 and 2010. It also forecast the trends up to 2050.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1950, the total birth rate had the highest at around 750000, whereas the death rate was just 700000. From 1950 to 2010, in terms of birth rate showed some significant change, which rose dramatically, reaching a peak of 1000000 in 1970, and then it fell drastically to 600000 in 1990. However, the birth rate increased slightly to 700000 in 2010. Interestingly, death rate, on the other hand, was remained the same throughout the given period.
The projections upto 2050 indicates that the birth rate is estimated to level off the following period of thirty years, and finally it will reach 700000 by 2050. In contrast, the death rate is anticipated to hike slightly and it will tough approximately 800000 by 2050.
All in all, it is clear that the death rate is likely to increase, while the figure for birth rate is projected to stabilise.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extend do you agree or disagree?What other measure do you think might be effective? 78
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 84
- In many countries, plastic bags are one of the main sources of damage to the environment, and so they should be banned.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 94
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for examples working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5280278893 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.617158777 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362373266516 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14279051194 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982220197249 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212641000114 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106821046515 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.