People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
People should prefer to question the rule of authority rather than blindly following them. Without a doubt, there can be no rule that is perfect; there can always be a possibility of improvement. The authority can make rules that may seem right to them at the time of making, but it is possible that it turns out to be wrong. Therefore, people should not be following a rule without being pragmatic about it unless its something that is made for their own good and the people have insufficient knowledge about its reasoning.
To begin with, no rule can be perfect; so people should always think twice before following any rule in the first place. For example, there has been a new rule that the government of India came up with: People should link their Adhar card, which is a new unique identity card for Indians, with their bank accounts. Even though this rule was made up to track down all the business transactions and try to secure everyone's data, It turned out to be skeptical as reports started coming out stating that some people got hacked and all of their money was stolen.
Furthermore, if a rule comes out, people should always question whether it is going to work in practical scenarios. Again, referring to the previous example, people found out about the technical flaws of such a nationally introduced identity system much later. If everyone would have had asked: How will you make sure our personal information is safe and secured and cannot be exploited? Then maybe the government would have had either made sure that there were no loopholes in the system before its launch, or discarded the rule altogether in the first place.
In contrast to the above-mentioned situations, there can be a situation where people simply are not aware of how secure is their personal information. So by issuing the new identity card: Adhar card, the government has taken a great initiative for the people to have a unique identification system, rather than having multiple systems, just as the current identity security system in the USA: Social security number. So without a doubt, by making the rule, that everyone in India should have an Adhar card, the government has taken a much-needed and inevitable decision for the people and such type of rules can be followed by the people unequivocally it in a few scenarios.
In conclusion, it is always a good idea to ask: Is this rule of authority appropriate and helpful to everyone? If the answer is yes, then certainly we can follow it. But if the answer is no then the people have to take actions to make it right. However, sometimes people are incapable of knowing what is best for them and if they follow the rule of authority undoubtedly, it can be ultimately beneficial for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | vibhu04 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | hridi123456 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | Walia Farzana | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Shashwat Singh | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | pyash | 66 | view |
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 66
- People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had had'?
Suggestion: had had
...identity system much later. If everyone would have had asked: How will you make sure our perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78736842105 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63984890023 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465263157895 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1516412846 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3888888889 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274469034901 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112214851315 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104169572371 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177045705622 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592129893805 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.