The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps compare the variation of an island before and after the construction of some transport and service buildings for tourism.
In general, the island has changed considerably with the main developments are that the island is accessible and visitors have some places to stay. Furthermore, although the island has been modern, the natural environment has been not destroyed.
To specify, before becoming a tourist attraction, the island was completely bare with only a beach and a few trees.
On the other hand, there was a dramatic change on the island after the construction of some tourist facilities. Many hunts have been built to accommodate visitors with footpaths connected to each other and liked to the beach where a swimming area has been designed. The other physical structures that have been added are a reception, in the middle of the island, and a restaurant to the north of the reception. On the opposite side of the restaurant, a pier where the boats can dock has been erected. There is also a vehicle tracking has been developed around the reception and linked the reception to the restaurant and the pier. Strikingly, the trees have been kept the original position even though a variety of modern facilities have been constructed.
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002. It includes those with a degree, whose with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other qualifications. 67
- The diagram below hows how salt is removed from sea water to make drinkable. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82417039581 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0870605117 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181482114071 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840449316733 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905806772505 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136750405162 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678492831089 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.