Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
More and more people are now traveling to other countries of higher educations, business or tourism. Some people think that visitors should follow the culture and traditions of their host country where they aboard while others claim that the host nation should respect cultural diversity. In my opinion, not only the visitors should adapt to the local culture but also the host country should welcome the different cultures from the world.
First, understanding the local norms and traditions of the host country brings many advantages to the visitors. For the tourists, it will help them feel comfortable with local inhabitants, and meanwhile, for international students, they can avoid cultural shocks when they need to stay for a long time in a different country. Furthermore, visitors have better chances of blending themselves with the local community, and also enjoy a greater degree of acceptance. The more visitors give respect to the customs, the more they will receive love and kindness from the local inhabitants.
On the other side, it may be difficult for the visitors to adapt to the local culture, so the host country has responsibilities to show a welcome friendly. Besides, culture diversity brings many advantages to the host country from its culture to the national economy. First, it creates an international environment inside the country and consequently, when people who come from the host country visit another country, they will not meet cultural shocks. Another benefit of embracing diversity is that it makes the life more colorful. When people belonging in different cultures live together in one place, they will have an opportunity to share the variety of kinds of music, festivals, and learn several languages. Finally, economically speaking, the more visitors will come, the national economy is also improved and will spread the information about that country to international friends. A good example is the US where is home to all the world. Their growth rates are a result of their willingness to welcome talent people without respect of their cultural backgrounds.
To sum up, I believe both the visitors and hosts should welcome cultural differences. Culture diversity has many benefits not only in the own host culture but also its economy, but this should not be the expense of the local culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | YGGGG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | huythinhtran95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Username Username Username | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Username Username Username | 61 | view |
- The table describes in thousands the estimated and actual numbers of houses built in the UK by region in 2002 67
- Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002. It includes those with a degree, whose with a higher degree (postgraduate) and those with other qualifications. 67
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002 It includes those with a degree whose with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications 90
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23404255319 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76405417332 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481382978723 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2767288151 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.764705882 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393023961497 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136470393999 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120388459187 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277960773977 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137307655937 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.