The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The column charts give information about the work that English graduates and post graduates did after finishing courses at school in 2008.
It is clear that further study was the number one choice of both graduates and post graduates in UK while doing voluntary work attracted the least students.
As can be seen from the first chart, nearly 30000 pupils kept on studying further on their own technique, standing at No.1 while doing part-time work and becoming out of work had almost equal number of students, at 17,735 and 16,235. Voluntary work was done by very few English graduates, just only 3,500 which was much smaller than the others.
Remaining at No. 1 was still further study with 2,785 students; however, the number of post graduates doing part-time job after leaving college was bigger than that of graduates, standing at over 2,500. The proportion of joblessness of post graduates in England was about more than 1600 compared to only 345 pupils doing voluntary work, this figure was ten times smaller than that of graduates.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 95
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98850574713 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38003209665 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3064428658 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146881480256 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896270542966 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679688040608 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116327136571 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684660089188 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.