The chart below shows the development of small fishing town of European in three decades.
The given pictorial chart reveals the evolution of small fishing town into large European tourists resorts.
At a glance it is observed that overall development of small fishing town after period of three decades. In 2004 the amount of hotels had changed the harbour and the boats along the beach. In the same time, The woodland simply switched to golf course and olive plants entirely replaced woth farmland. it was curvey road as a result demolsing cattle, sheep and goats which significantly through the beach also there were several fundamental changes in village. It is also near mountains where village added tourist shops connected to farmland and increasingly, original village had no changes.
In the nutsell, overall population is also soaring from 12000 in 1974 and rised to 80000 and 50000 tourist during peak season.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-17 | Simran tangri | 56 | view |
- Happiness can be bought with money according to some people, but others believe it can not be purchased 22
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European countries in 1979 to 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparision where relevant. 90
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasingat a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 56
- The diagram below shows the development a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. 78
- It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...plants entirely replaced woth farmland. it was curvey road as a result demolsing c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 699.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49087222564 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.725925925926 0.547539520022 133% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.192111119 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208766870359 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950135317713 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152434133501 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138224834399 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11616327787 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.