summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
Is that set of materials, the reading part explains some theories about the manuscript of the hand written book and illustrates reasons for her or his claims, and the listening section cast doubt on the specific information presented in the passage argues that in the reading section illustrates three theories and he investigates these theories in listening section
First, the passage posits that handwritten book is a really important book and has secret codes. However, the lecture makes point out that in the reading part exists some important reason in order to these codes aren't fake and he introduces a physics theory and he accepts the claims that proposed in reading part.
Second, according to the text manuscript was fake and it's text, no real meaning. Speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that codes of the book are real and there is no reason so that we result in these are fake.
third, the article claims that this book creates in contemporary and introduces some reasons, on the contrary, the lecture points out that dating for book show that the ink on page of the book belongs 4000 years ago, therefore, this book is an original book.
In conclusion, the points out the book bolster the mentioned of information in the passage as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 68
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? because of the world changing so quickly. people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- how do this idea in listening passage cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage? 66
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?To improw the quality of the education, university should spend more money on salaries for university professors. use specific reason and examples to support your ansewr. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...mportant reason in order to these codes arent fake and he introduces a physics theory...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...n so that we result in these are fake. third, the article claims that this book crea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89351851852 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52996022323 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.405048845 49.2860985944 263% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.166666667 110.228320801 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 21.698381199 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6666666667 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111998778368 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581751942334 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325109804035 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657112336723 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255543997857 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.7273730684 261% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.