workers are more satisfied when they do different types of tasks than when they do a single task
Jobs cover the biggest part of people's life. workers spend almost ten hours a day in their work place, and the tasks they do create the feeling they have toward their works. While some people believe it is better to ask workers to do one tasks, others think doing multi tasks will give a more positive feeling to workers. I agree with the second point of view and will elaborate on my opinion with the following reasons.
First, people by doing different tasks will not get bored and feel better about their job. Doing the same things all day long for some years is the thing which can make a job really boring, meanwhile being multi-task helps workers to feel they do more activities, and helps to find a better feeling of their job. My own life experience is a compelling example of this point. Last year, I started my job as a teacher in an elementary school. My duty was teaching different subjects, and it was one of the things which could make my job really enjoyable to me. On the other hand, a friend of mine was an English teacher, and she believed teaching a single subject for years really makes her bored. This life experience is one the reasons why I hold this idea that doing different tasks can bring a more satisfying feeling to the job people do.
Second, people face more challenges by doing different category of tasks which makes them to think more, and as a result feel more positive and satisfied about their job. Doing a single task for years can make it as a routine, and people can do it even with their eyes closed. In contrast, having different types of tasks can make the work more challenging, and makes workers to think more and work with all their bodies and minds. As the result, they will feel more satisfied by their job. As an example I can mention my brother. He is a construction engineer and has to deal with lots of different tasks each day. None of his days is similar to others, and he likes this aspect of his work the best. As he says, doing different tasks forces him to think wider and consider lots of things before taking any decision, and it is the thing which makes his work really enjoyable to him. This experience gives me another reasons for believing that doing different types of jobs makes people more happy about their job.
To sum up, there is not a lot which people can do to make their job more interesting, but by doing different tasks, people can find their job more enjoyable to them. Being multi-task helps workers to feel more fresh during their work time, and also brings different situations to deal with them which makes their job more pleasant. Based on these justifications, my conviction is that workers by doing different tasks can have a better opinion toward their job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-19 | nastaran1992 | 70 | view |
- Does the feeling students have about their teacher matter? 70
- YOU PREFER TO BE A LEADER OR A MEMBER OF A TEAM? 70
- the things we learn from friends are more important than the things we learn from family 70
- long distance migration of humpbacks, and provides three reasons of support why it believes they use stars as a tool of navigation. 71
- because modern life is complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Workers
...cover the biggest part of peoples life. workers spend almost ten hours a day in their w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... will feel more satisfied by their job. As an example I can mention my brother. He...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, while, as to, in contrast, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54527162978 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2749466529 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406438631791 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7317082074 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2173913043 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6086956522 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322917577026 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11936084021 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903149548333 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248883774857 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367494090966 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.