summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part discusses the opposition of power companies for recycling coal ash and introduce some result in order to show these activities are not necessary. and the listening section refutes the information presented in the passage, and, argues that power companies should recycle their waste products and recycling is very important.
First, the passage posits that this kind of pollutions allways exist and companies reduce pollutions. However, the lecture makes the point that companies activities are not sufficient landfill is harmful and creates significant damage such as polluting groundwater where landfill created.
Second, according to the text whenever coal ash is stored makes recycling discourage and recycling of coal ash is harmful. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that other materials are more harmful than coal ash such as mercury, these kinds of material store and recycle without any problem.
Third, the article claims that whenever companies store coal ash makes the price increase. on the contrary, the lecture points out that by all these activities price increase only 1 percent.
In conclusion the talk
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. do you think this is a good a idea? 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...how these activities are not necessary. and the listening section refutes the infor...
^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e and recycling of coal ash is harmful. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...tore coal ash makes the price increase. on the contrary, the lecture points out th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 183.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47540983607 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.622825589 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601092896175 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4135967031 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0594305019879 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251174150777 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026235957517 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0308425402796 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166740574877 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.