Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are the best ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
People assume that the only rational reason for a prison is to restrain those who are violent, while helping them to change their behavior and return to the community. Regarding that opinion, a proportion suggests that using educational methods and applying vocational training perform an optimizing effectiveness compared to putting criminals into jail. Personally, a sharp agreement is my point of views.
Firstly, probation and parole fail to educate criminals as the recidivism is significant high in majority countries. Due to statistics, there are four out of ten prisoners being re-arrested within four years of liberation, often with a more serious and violent offense. Moreover, this rate has an increasing tendency to reach 50% after six years of leaving prison. Consequently, imprisoning criminals is not considered as an appropriate method to transform prisoners into a better citizens.
Secondly, education and job training can not only help to improve offenders attitudes, but also offer them a visual chance to find a job and settle down after releasing. Based on a study in San Francisco jail, an intensive re-educational program with violent male offenders reduced the level of violence in the jail to zero for a year at a time. This means prisoners who received the proper education had a significant positive change in awareness and attitude, leading to rehabilitated criminals are less likely to re-offend. Additionally, the percentage of recidivism also reduced to 93% after the offenders succeeded in having a job.
In conclusion, it is obviously that education and vocational training can address the root causes of crime. These methods have a possibility of reducing first crime as well as recidivism rate, which are the realistic solutions that help to maintain the stable for our societies.
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr 86
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is to maintain old buildings? 89
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37062937063 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04650411851 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6283025988 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222132858317 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711127571979 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452709411418 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126318811158 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305874441314 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.