Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement claims that educational institutions ought to justify the students’ future success base on their choice of the field of study. Surely educational institutions play an important role in the forming future of students. Although, these institutions know characteristics of students and have knowledge about the future of the various field of studies, creating a bias on a specific field of study will cause students to decide incorrectly.
The statement attempts to bridge the success of students to accepting the advice of educational institutions. The assumption is that these institutions could suggest the best field of study base on students’ personality and skills. One could argue that dissuading students from a particular field of study will benefit students from less time and money consumption for education along with the most chance of success at future, but this argument does not consider that all people do not have a unique imagination of success.
However, confining students to a specific field of study will deprive them of a holistic view of their studying major. Considering an artificial intelligence student at a university who only studied computer vision and did not know how it is related to mobile development, consequently mentioned person will lose many job positions opportunities that need a computer vision programmer for Android devices.
In contrast to the statement, studying various fields of study helps students to familiarize with other aspects and applications of their discipline. For example, computational neuroscience is a multidisciplinary field that students need computer programming and neuroscience knowledge. Moreover, studying brain functions inspire new computer algorithms. Therefore, different fields of study can inspire students to produce new ideas and also can lead them to find new interest for follow up in their future.
Ultimately, encouraging students to pursue an only limited field of studies have a negative effect on their success. Educational institutions should provide sufficient facilities for students to study different fields and bring them adequate knowledge for choosing a favorite field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- “In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.” 76
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...consequently mentioned person will lose many job positions opportunities that need a com...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68597560976 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20635331667 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6125422209 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.214285714 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203780006148 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863326070388 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389439507049 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131284120472 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400833374161 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.1639044944 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.