The article and the professor argue on the woman painting if it belongs to Rembrandt. The article states that the painting was not portraited by him and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor says that everything in the painting was true. Indeed, the investigators concluded that the painting was portraited by Rembrandt after the thorough examination and she refuted each of the author's opinions.
First, the article states that the painting was inconsistent because of the white line cap which is servant only use along with the luxurious coat. this mismatch seems the painting was not painted by Rembrandt. The professor says that after the x-ray analysis of the pigments of the dress, it was not a part of the original painting. he explained that the portrait was painted100 years after the original painting was made to attract the more audience.
Second, the article avers that the Rembrandt was the master in painting light and shadow but in this portrait, they didn't fit together. The professor contended this point by saying once the recent paint was removed, the original painting of light color in the painting illuminate the light on the face. She mentioned that, the light would be darken because of repaint.
Finally, the passage climes that the back of the painting reveals that the portrait was painted on the panel of the glued piece of wood. However, the professor says that the original portrait was on the single wood piece. she explained that to enlarge the size of the painting they glued the extra piece of wood at the top and the wood of the both pieces are the part of the same tree.
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 81
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 73
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 76
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e refuted each of the authors opinions. First, the article states that the paint...
^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nly use along with the luxurious coat. this mismatch seems the painting was not pai...
^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...as not a part of the original painting. he explained that the portrait was painted...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t and shadow but in this portrait, they didnt fit together. The professor contended t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... portrait was on the single wood piece. she explained that to enlarge the size of t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86330935252 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44878179318 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456834532374 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0436243619 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484889309675 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206668793903 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103545401705 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333969739493 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512521116887 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.