The author states that three theories explaining the origin of the Voynich manuscript, and he provides three reasons for support. However, the professor claims that the three people who made the script mentioned by the author were unconvincing, and he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading asserts that Anthony Ascham a physician in sixteen century was a possible author. The lecture counters this idea by saying that Ascham was an ordinary physician. His book showed that his knowledge based on well-known sources which different from the idea in the manuscript" Voynich".
Second, the reading points out that the second theory claims that the manuscript was created by the Edward Kelly as a fake magical book. The professor contradicts this point by telling that it is unconvincing that Kelly was selling the book to rich people because of the people at that time were intelligent enough that they could know if this book was fake. In fact, the manuscript was a simple book that easily recognized by the population at that time.
Finally, the article explains that the third theory says the manuscript was a modern fake created by Wilfrid M. Voynich himself. However, the professor points out that the book Voynich and the ink used to write were 400 years old. So, if the Vonichy was creating it as a fake, from where he brought the ink which is 4000years old. Therefore, it seemed that the manuscript was discovered a century before Vonich obtained it.
- TPO 30 60
- Tpo 48 80
- uestion:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
- tpo 12 68
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 63
Essay evaluation report
The author states that three theories explaining the origin of the Voynich manuscript
The author states three theories explaining the origin of the Voynich manuscript
The author states that three theories will be explaining the origin of the Voynich manuscript
three people who made the script mentioned by the author were unconvincing
three people .... were unconvincing ???
his knowledge based on well-known sources which different from the idea in the manuscript" Voynich".
his knowledge is based on well-known sources which are different from the idea in the manuscript" Voynich". //need verbs
because of the people at that time were intelligent enough
because the people at that time were intelligent enough
they could know if this book was fake.
they could know whether this book was fake.
---------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2 //read a good grammar book
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 248 250
No. of Characters: 1200 1200
No. of Different Words: 124 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.968 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.839 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.459 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.222 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.59 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...t Anthony Ascham a physician in sixteen century was a possible author. The lecture coun...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02419354839 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64411613892 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536290322581 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2395334261 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232739500882 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902313878764 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056064018552 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135877974814 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475930864717 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.