It is obvious when you are trying to choose a leader for a group, you should consider different factors. Leader of a group plays a vital role in a group and a good leader helps a team to achieve its goals easier and faster. Although there are a lot of traits which a good leader can have, I strongly believe that the most important characteristic of a leader is being honest. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think leader of a group should have characteristics such as taking responsibility, being intelligent, being diligent, and so on. Nevertheless, the most prominent trait of a leader is to be honest. If a group has a sincere leader, other members of the team can trust him or her. As a result, it encourages all members to work and try harder in order to achieve their objectives, and this group will be more successful. For example, when I was a student at high school, I took part in a group activity. But unfortunately although our leader was a clever person, he was a dishonest person. Hence, he was not a reliable one and members did not rely on him anymore, and we were forced to choose another person as a leader.
Moreover, I believe that when a leader of a team has not sincerity and honesty, it causes members of group do not obey him or her and are not responsible for their duties. Thus, this group cannot meet its aims and it makes damage to whole of group. For instance, my friend had participated in a student group, his leader lied to them in favor of herself. Consequently, members did not respect her and pay attention her. They did not carry out their tasks properly and thus our team could not gain satisfactory results.
To sum up, it is essential that a group’s leader has suitable characteristics in order to help the group fulfill its aims. In my point of view, being honest is the most important trait of a leader because without having sincerity, members of team cannot trust him or her and do not cooperate with each other to achieve their goals.
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 60
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 42
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54324324324 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75312558946 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502702702703 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4362420954 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3888888889 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170624384891 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616481877413 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524512328642 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120642816482 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517665830632 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.