Friendship is one of the most precious relationships for one to have, it means you have a concrete backup to support you whenever you get tired, a strong hand pulls you over if you slipped in one of life's path so, once you found it, stuck to it, for the whole days of your life. No doubts that, developing connections with a new company and preserving old friends both have merits, however, I tend to keep in touch with my old sincerely friends rather than making contacts with new ones. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
At first, old friends knew your personality well and you have earned their trust fully, therefore, they would stand up for in your personal crises, with no need to justify your situations. For example, seven years ago when I was in Syria I had a job interview in Damascus city, which is far away from my hometown in Aleppo, at that time I was broken and that job seemed a good opportunity to get, however, the problem was I had a shortage of money, and I could not afford hotel rent since I needed to stay a couple days to finish my staff. I was embarrassed, fortunately, I got an invitation from my loyalty friend "Hanan" to go with her to visit her sister's home who is dwelling in Damascus. It was a perfect savior to me and my dignity indeed.
Secondly, old friends shared tremendous events and memories together, as a result, their companion would never be bored, every time they have met, it would be an interesting journey through their lives, For instance, no one could cheer me up with lovely stories as my friend "Wisam" could, we have been together since we were in the elementary school, until graduating from the college, thus she has numerous funny stories to recall with me on all occasions.
In conclusion, depending on my life experience, I believe old buddies are worthy to keep on, instead of seeking for new ones. Because old loyalty friends support you in decent humanity manner during personal crises and you always would have the most enjoyable times to share with them more than any one of your life.
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 60
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 80
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61213720317 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6355629841 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583113456464 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.395184157 48.9658058833 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.8 100.406767564 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.9 20.6045352989 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 5.45110844103 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207337689029 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881518999125 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772340016701 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139621022497 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697294615093 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 11.7677419355 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.