Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?.
People nowadays are open to other beliefs and open to new things. There are few who thinks that we have a lot of choices in life now compare before but there are still some who oppose to this idea. This essay will outline why I strongly agree that we have too many options nowadays.
First and foremost, there is more freedom nowadays compare before wherein people are restricted with conservative cultural beliefs, especially women. People before base their action on whatever cultural belief they have since it is believed to be the norm and those who will disobey this will be put to shame whereas today, people tend to be more open to others belief as well, therefore, people can freely do what they want to do now. A female wanting to have a job, for instance, can do only household chores but now women can choose whatever job they want to do even if the work is usually for men. In addition to that, parenting style is different nowadays. Children before are obliged to do what their parents want them to do compare now that children can choose what they want for their lives and their parents support them. Lastly, other countries are open and are helping each other now in contrast before wherein they fight for each others territory. Since countries became helpful to other countries, people began to have more option and more opportunities in life.
Conversely, there are still some people who think that nothing has changed and that there are still few options for them which may be due to the place they lived in where the majority of the people still believe in the old ways and is resistant to change but I still think that a lot of countries open up to others nowadays versus those place that still sticks to their own belief and because of the openness today it will not be impossible in the long run that people's belief in these areas will change as well due to human nature of being curious that may break the old way of thinking.
All in all, I believe that there are more options nowadays compare before mainly because of the influences of people to each other that made us become open minded and due to close ties of different countries today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | hieu19101995 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | hieu19101995 | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-27 | venusrio | 73 | view |
| 2016-07-24 | pakasai | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?. 73
- The table below shows some data regarding Australia s nursing employment and total workforce in 1987 and 2001 87
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The flow chart below shows the three stages of glass bottle recycling. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in diffirent weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 943, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...rast before wherein they fight for each others territory. Since countries became helpf...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owadays compare before mainly because of the influences of people to each other t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5912596401 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.191260002 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457583547558 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.37135396 49.4020404114 278% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.833333333 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4166666667 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20532411503 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855561898563 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618736062056 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135393302947 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759306994072 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.