the following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000
The given bar chart illustrates the different modes of transport which people used to travel and go to work in European city during the period from 1960 to 2000. What stands out from the given bar chart is that the number of people who traveled by car was the highest number in 2000 whereas it was the lowest number in 1960. In the first glance of the bar chart, the percentage of ordinary people went on foot at 35%, as opposed to the bottom of the list which was traveled by car at 5% in 1960. However, the number of people who choosed bus was ranked at the first position at 25%, compared to the last place which was the number of people went on foot at 15% in 1980. Subsequently, car became the most popular transportation in 2000. The percentage of people who traveled by car was nowhere as high as it was by bike in 2000, at 35% and 5% respectively. In general, the number of people who traveled by bike was not quite as high as it was on foot, at 20% and 15% correspondingly. Finally, Top of the place was for people who traveled by bike, which was 20% higher than it was between 1960 and 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | quynhthi2001 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Omfiann | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Raksha rai | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 61
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 72
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 67
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, whereas, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.21800947867 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3986287196 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436018957346 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6660406594 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228634522975 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140705316266 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159984652973 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228634522975 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.