The bar chart illustrates the mediocre development of local products from the 1960s to the 1990s. It compares three group of countries: Wealthy countries, countries that have used a global approach to business and countries that have not.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen that W countries and G countries hit the peak at 5% in the 1960s and 1990s respectively. During the period 1960s to 1990s, the production in W countries decreased from 5% to nearly 1.5%. Whereas, in this period, G countries grew in producing domestic products from approximately 1.5% to 5%. On the other hand, NG countries went through an erratic period from the 1960s to the 1990s. Comparing to 1960s, in 1970s, NG countries developed in local domestics, however that was not remarkable. In the 1980s, NG countries had a salient decline to 1% and after that, in 1990s it negligibly increased to 1.5%.
It can be concluded that during the 1960s to 1990s W countries declined in producing domestic goods while G countries had a fluctuated period.
- All inventions and discoveries like the discovery of fire and electricity have impacts on our lives so much that people can no longer live without them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Environmental degradation is a major world problem What causes this problem and what we can do to prevent it 80
- All inventions and discoveries like the discovery of fire and electricity have impacts on our lives so much that people can no longer live without them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...1960s to the 1990s. Comparing to 1960s, in 1970s, NG countries developed in local domest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...a salient decline to 1% and after that, in 1990s it negligibly increased to 1.5%. It ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8457831317 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.5339195218 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312701296397 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147528252335 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14754372994 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256556446605 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137899547891 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.