The following appeared as part of a recommendation made by a faculty member to the president of a large university.
"Never once in our 150-year history as a university have we clarified our objectives. How, then, can we hope to adapt as an
institution to the new challenges facing higher education. As a first step in this evolutionary process, therefore, we should send our questionnaires asking faculty members why they want from this university, and asking former students what they gained from their own education here. When the replies come in, we can tabulate them and formulate an official statement of our educational mission. This will surely result in improved programs at our university."
Argument stated by faculty member to the president of a large university is convincing and seems properly studied with supportive points. In this challenging and emerging world with new technologies, it is required to have effective and well planned long term goals and objectives. Without having direction, it may difficult for such a large university to sustain in near future. And as faculty memeber has stated that higher education is facing the new challenges, to have clear objectives to address them is curcial.
Further, faculty member proposed to prepare and send questionnaires in order to get feedback from other faculty members as well as from students. Again it is important step for instigating such evolutionary process. As feedback is most vital part in large organization, it will be helpful to understand flaws exists in institution. In questionnaires, faculty members are asked for expection from institution and students are for how beneficial education persued from institute is. Hidden shortcoming may come into picture while evaluating received feedback and shall be focus for better further development. From feedback, what positive things are already being helpful to faculty members shall be retained or further can be ameliorated. Additionally, tenuous links or missing bridges can be accomplished or can be planned to achieve soon.
Shortcomings and provided facilities received from feedback can be tabulated for further processing. These data can be formulated in official statement stating actions for mitigatation of existing shortcoming as a part of short term and long term as well. This can be a clear mission and vision of institute and can be useful to attract more talent to their institution for persue better programs. With such pellucid mission, such large institute can withstand with proud among other educational institutes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-30 | PriteshAmrelia | 23 | view |
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want 57
- Truth is always bitter. 16
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation made by a faculty member to the president of a large university."Never once in our 150-year history as a university have we clarified our objectives. How, then, can we hope to adapt as aninstitution to th 23
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
it is out of topic. this is not an issue essay.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 289 350
No. of Characters: 1554 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.123 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.377 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.943 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.419 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.333 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 289.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48788927336 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0451006583 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2690543187 57.8364921388 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.70786347227 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124234429568 0.218282227539 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488503760434 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310655961676 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945039885438 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321730187556 0.0628817314937 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.