School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want.
It is true that many students approach School or University in order to get chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective jobs. Similarly, employers too looks for specific talents from relevant colleges where they hopes for better requirement matching of students with current available jobs. In both cases, school need to provide balance environment and culture to grow students personally as well as professionally. Students are not only looking for technical or theotrical advancement in their study but also hoping for preparedness for industrial challanges. In such dilemma, it is better to have dual intent policies implemntation by schools.
Generally, students and teachers, at school level, expect to have good academics only in terms of grades and no more than descent understanding in their major field of study. Anything more than just providing a quality education to students is sufficient for both teachers and students. On contrary to that, employers are not satisfied merely with good academics. At corporate level, other skills - communication skills, presentation skills - do not have less priority than that of technical skills. For an example, schools may have rigid syllabus over the past few years that just focus on mathematics and general
science. When compared to real life technology, is a bit different and of basic level. Students by studying general science at school do not get broader ideas and failed to develop their skills relevant to prospective fields. And such talents come at corporate level, they faces very different and advance technology in the market and may not get fitted into the market due to lack of relevant skills. Only educational policies become inadequate when preparing talent for future rife with technological advancement.
Mostly any corporate organization works in any primary field and also looks for talent which is relevant to their field. In such cases, students are not sure at school level about their long term visions. In such specific kind of requirements by employers, employers specific policy implementation may go wrong at initial level of education where common subjects of all fields are being taught. But while persuing major courses at University, such policy surely ameliorate chance of better employment opportunities.
It can be concluded from the arguments provided that, in case of general skills and requirements policies for students and teachers do not contradict those of employers. But when it comes to specific skills required by industry, school can not afford to prevent policy of other fields and strict to specific one. Perception towards policy of student is no more different than that of teacher and may also inclined to similar thought-process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Sivajeet Chand | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | PriteshAmrelia | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world.Why is this?What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 73
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation made by a faculty member to the president of a large university."Never once in our 150-year history as a university have we clarified our objectives. How, then, can we hope to adapt as aninstitution to th 23
- Governments should hire accomplished filmmakers to create films that deliver important public messages 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'platformed'.
Suggestion: platformed
...iversity in order to get chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective job...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'hope'
Suggestion: hope
...lents from relevant colleges where they hopes for better requirement matching of stud...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at just focus on mathematics and general science. When compared to real life tech...
^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'face', 'fax'
Suggestion: face; fax
...h talents come at corporate level, they faces very different and advance technology i...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... policy of student is no more different than that of teacher and may also inclined t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, similarly, so, well, while, kind of, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38106235566 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89799635568 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526558891455 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0964391467 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.952380952 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150077387512 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517906803818 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347349985105 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943781805072 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362560800797 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.