School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want.
It is true that many students approach School or University in order to get chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective jobs. Similarly, employers too looks for specific talents from relevant colleges where they hopes for better requirement matching of students with current available jobs. In both cases, school need to provide balance environment and culture to grow students personally as well as professionally. Students are not only looking for technical or theotrical advancement in their study but also hoping for preparedness for industrial challanges. In such dilemma, it is better to have dual intent policies implemntation by schools.
Generally, students and teachers, at school level, expect to have good academics only in terms of grades and no more than descent understanding in their major field of study. Anything more than just providing a quality education to students is sufficient for both teachers and students. On contrary to that, employers are not satisfied merely with good academics. At corporate level, other skills - communication skills, presentation skills - do not have less priority than that of technical skills. For an example, schools may have rigid syllabus over the past few years that just focus on mathematics and general
science. When compared to real life technology, is a bit different and of basic level. Students by studying general science at school do not get broader ideas and failed to develop their skills relevant to prospective fields. And such talents come at corporate level, they faces very different and advance technology in the market and may not get fitted into the market due to lack of relevant skills. Only educational policies become inadequate when preparing talent for future rife with technological advancement.
Mostly any corporate organization works in any primary field and also looks for talent which is relevant to their field. In such cases, students are not sure at school level about their long term visions. In such specific kind of requirements by employers, employers specific policy implementation may go wrong at initial level of education where common subjects of all fields are being taught. But while persuing major courses at University, such policy surely ameliorate chance of better employment opportunities.
It can be concluded from the arguments provided that, in case of general skills and requirements policies for students and teachers do not contradict those of employers. But when it comes to specific skills required by industry, school can not afford to prevent policy of other fields and strict to specific one. Perception towards policy of student is no more different than that of teacher and may also inclined to similar thought-process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-07 | PriteshAmrelia | 57 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 33
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects f 58
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- Governments should hire accomplished filmmakers to create films that deliver important public messages 58
- The real talent of popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'platformed'.
Suggestion: platformed
...iversity in order to get chance to have platform that lead them to their prospective job...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'hope'
Suggestion: hope
...lents from relevant colleges where they hopes for better requirement matching of stud...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at just focus on mathematics and general science. When compared to real life tech...
^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'face', 'fax'
Suggestion: face; fax
...h talents come at corporate level, they faces very different and advance technology i...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... policy of student is no more different than that of teacher and may also inclined t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, similarly, so, well, while, kind of, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38106235566 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89799635568 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526558891455 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0964391467 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.952380952 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150077387512 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517906803818 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347349985105 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943781805072 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362560800797 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.