Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, people have different viewpoints about the national investment on space research. In my opinion, while it is suggested that the spendings should be diverted to help human populations, outer space exploration is still worth an issue of concern.
There are many reasons why people should be supportive of governmental spending on space research. First, it is undeniable indisputable that the Earth is now under-resourced for many human activities and requirements, which can be tackled only by discovering and mining alternative ones on other planets. Since this is an inevitable task, it will encourage stimulate the creativity of humans in global technology race. People are likely to prone to invent machines to not only to explore another habitat but also improve the living condition in many other places.regions. By doing so, the expenditure in space study is no longer a stopgap measure but an enduring solution to maintain human well-being and broaden their horizon.
On the other hand, however, there are some drawbacks of this action that worth considering. First, since most of national budget originates from taxpayers’ income, the government should give allocation for other fields that benefit the majority of citizens, particularly education. For example, children from some poverty-stricken areas in Vietnam still have not been gaining access to rudimentary knowledge at schools due to a paucity of stationeries and textbooks. Therefore, if the regime places priority on catering for those educational demands, the incidents of national illiteracy will be eradicated. Moreover, space exploration projects are mostly long-term, which means they needs to be passed down from generation to generation. bequeathed to future generations. In this case, if some severe crisis unexpectedly happened, the government would be apt to discontinue those plans. Those dubious projects will turn out to be time-consuming and not worthy of money cost-effective like they are expected to be. and effort.
From what has been discussed, although space research is a forward step in the development of one nation and overall population, it is not to say that doing so doesn’t require massive national budget. The authority of one country should know how to allocate their spending depend on different circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | Limeluminous | 89 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Some cities have few controls on the design and construction of housing and office buildings. People think that they are free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on is still worth an issue of concern. There are many reasons why people should...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well-being and broaden their horizon. On the other hand, however, there are so...
^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
... are mostly long-term, which means they needs to be passed down from generation to ge...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Bequeathed
...sed down from generation to generation. bequeathed to future generations. In this case, if...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e they are expected to be. and effort. From what has been discussed, although s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55742296919 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17162297639 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602240896359 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.255574456 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.705882353 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169422650535 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486705821819 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488028321606 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107220200395 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035660748938 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.