The given bar charts show the total percentages of Americans who get married and divorced from 1970 to 2000 and the rate of adults who are in marital status in the US between 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the number of married couples is more or less double compared to that of divorced ones over the given period. When it comes to adults' marital status, the total ratio of being married is significantly larger than the others examined during the periods.
As for US's citizens, the number of people who tie the knot with their partners showed a downward trend from nearly 2.5 million at the beginning of the period to 2 million, with a constant number in 1980 as its 1970 figures. Meanwhile, there was a slight fluctuation pattern in divorces in the US. It started from 1 million people in 1970 and increased a little in a decade to 1.4 million, and its figure slightly declined and went back the same number of 1970.
On the contrary, between two years: 1970 and 2000, married couples accounted for the largest numbers, ranging from approximately 60 million to about 70 million. In the meantime, those who did not get married comprised of roughly less 20million in both year, which was considerably lower than the data of married ones. Contrarily, the groups who are widowed or divorced made up only less 10 million during these times.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for six areas of the world. 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 89
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ess double compared to that of divorced ones over the given period. When it comes to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trary, between two years: 1970 and 2000, married couples accounted for the larges...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, more or less, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71008403361 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45756658108 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3655462159 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148230339675 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656199045334 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711413269522 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108169543456 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075986127735 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.