The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie charts give information about the percentage of British students who could speak foreign languages except for their mother tongue at a university in England between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the most popular second language among British pupils in this college was Spanish between two periods of time, while there were the least students who can speak German.
The most significant feature is that 30% of students could speak Spanish only, which was the highest figures at the beginning of the period, and in a decade, its rate increased by 5%. Similarly, those who speak another language accounted for 15% in 2000, and in the final year, comprised of 20%. In light of students speaking two other languages were just 10% in 2000, and also soared to 15% in 2010.
In contrast, more or less half of students do not know how to speak other languages at all in 2000, but in a decade, its figure showed a considerable decrease to 10%. Besides, 15% of British students knew how to speak French in 2000; however, its statistics declined by 5% in 2010. In the meanwhile, during both periods, there were the same proportion of pupils at the university, who were only able to speak German with 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solution? 84
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems. 56
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, except for, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7523364486 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43346701763 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0032550612 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448354824427 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195700009689 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734530266048 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2692268147 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797692153769 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.