The graph shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by train, car, and bus.
The line graph shows information about the number of people commuting each day in the UK by three different means of transport from 1970 with forecast to 2030.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were significant upward trends in the number of people traveling by car and train, while the people using bus saw a slight decrease from 1970 to 2010. It is predicted that those trends will continue in the future.
Looking at the details, the number of people commuting by bus experienced a gradual decline from around 4 million in 1970 to well over 3 million in 2010. It is expected that this figure will continue to go down and hit a trough of roughly 3 million in 2030. By contrast, the number of commuters using train started at about 2 million in 1970. At this point, the figure increased steadily until now. After that, it is likely to overtake the expected figure for people traveling by bus, and finally reach about 5 million in 2030.
Regarding the number of people driving to work, the trend was similar to that of people using train. There was a considerable growth from around 5 million to around 7 million in 2010. Next, this figure is anticipated to rise quickly to almost 9 million in 2030, which means that it will be the most popular means of transport in the future.
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 78
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 85
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pular means of transport in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, regarding, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60256410256 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38054135333 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6592239184 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233082962943 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849884193466 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956199802436 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160333877894 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092272688439 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.