The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption.
The line graph presents four types consumption of meat and poultry in the United States between 1955 and 2012.
It is clear that the consumption of beef was more than others between 1955 and 1976; it achieved the highest amount of 90 pounds in 1976. At the same period time, the demand of pork was unstable and bottomed up with less than 40 pounds in 1976. Looking at the more detail, the consumption of broilers and turkey started to show up since 1961. The consumption of turkey rose to 10 pounds for each people every year and until hitting a plateau after 1991.
Between 1976 and 1982, the consumption of beef started to plummet nearly 20 pounds while the demand of pork upswing at least 10 pounds. The consumption of broilers exceeded the amount of pork around 50 pounds in 1994; in 2010, it overtook the consumption of beef around 60 pounds. After 2009, each type consumption became as plateau and started to dip.
As a whole, the total demand of meat and poultry was rising from 110 pounds to 180 pounds between 1955 and 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries. 67
- Parents should control the amount of time their children spend on the internet 73
- Children nowadays use a lot of technology in school. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology in school. 73
- Some people say that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 91
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58288770053 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27336260387 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1381743925 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0682172645708 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361430539882 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587443375962 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726138347011 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691779110511 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.