should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
There are people who believe that wealthy nations should be required to share their wealth among poorer nations. Because nowadays the different between wealthy nations and poorer nations is too much long distance. While the stocks in the wealthy nations are really stressful everyday with scales get up and down widely, a lot of people do not have anything to each day bay day. But it is not meaning that a huge of wealth is used to help the poorer nations. This wealth need to be used for succoring in accurate ways.
On suggestion to help solve the problem is providing such as things as food and education for the poorer nations. For example, a plenty of scholarships is supported for Africa students form the Europe nation’s governments and American government every year and volunteer group also is sent to here for educating. This is one of way to build a new generation has education to be able to develop their country by themselves. Beside, food is the most important demand of the human for life. The people in poorer nations also is received the food to prevent them from diseases and starving. These sharing from the wealthy nations is the most necessary for the poorer nation.
However, I think that it is more important to consider that the governments of poorer nations have responsibility to look after their citizens themselves because the wealthy nations always have copious capability for standing by the poorer nations. In that situation their governments need to lead their country. By using the advantages from natural, minerals, their country can be existing from the list of poorer nations. Developing the nation is the only one method to be not a poorer nation anymore.
In addition, there are a lot of different country in the world and they are not obviously the same the start place. But world every nation need to effort to build their country and help each other for the happiness all over the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- the map below show the centre of the small town and the developed plan. 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 61
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...he wealthy nations are really stressful everyday with scales get up and down widely, a l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ve anything to each day bay day. But it is not meaning that a huge of wealth is used to help t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r for the happiness all over the world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, really, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86445783133 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53678661421 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490963855422 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6896108086 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553780308902 0.244688304435 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180272134433 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132615662236 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317035014979 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145937347793 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.