The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar graphs illustrate, the information of reality show and game show watchers in both genders with four various age groups in Australia. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it has been clear from the charts that, the noticeable gender of reality show viewers are females. While, males are watching game shows than reality program. Similarly, the most significant TV program viewers are age over 45 in both genders.
As is observed, 70% of Australian ladies are watching reality show broadcasting which is 10% higher than females who interested in game shows (60%). However, males viewers of game shows (about 62%) which is doubled than reality shows with 35%.
Regarding, the age group of 16 to 24 was relatively same interested in both programs with just above 50%. While, the young adults with 25 to 34 years of age people was watching reality shows than game shows such as 60% and almost 40% respectively. Likewise, the reality show customers are considerably higher than sports channel viewership in the age of 35 to 44 which is approximately 65% and around 40% each. Moreover, above 45 years people was more prone to be watching both TV programs account for around 70%.
- Some people tend to buy products or get services instantly without waiting Why is it happening Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology canreplace their functions.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er of reality show viewers are females. While, males are watching game shows than rea...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...%. While, the young adults with 25 to 34 years of age people was watching reality...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years of age people was watching reality shows than game shows such as 60% and al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, similarly, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98994974874 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62095831507 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7006477793 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899700074505 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413698482037 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349922098146 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697993079255 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377104945713 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.