In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In some nations, the unemployment rate consistently is higher than the others, most of the students should attend in primary schools. It is not necessary to provide secondary education for young learners who are unwilling to seek a job. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this statement illustrated below.
The pursuit of studying either primary schools or secondary ones would be an effective way to alleviate the national financial burden. That is because they can allocate budget to supply food and beverage for starving people instead of constructing educational institutions. However, this strategy is likely to be a short-sighted view because it leads to not only the low quality of labor workforce but also poorly-educated citizens among countries. For example, the real shortage of fundamental knowledge of technology or literacy might hinder their work productivity and effective communication.
The dire consequences of providing neither elementary nor middle schools to pupils are undeniable. That is because they would be more susceptible to negative peer pressure and commit a crime such as murdering, smuggling or sexual abuse if without being offered good comprehensive schools. Furthermore, ineffective literacy skills are able to be enormous obstacles to communicate in different situations, especially work environment. Besides, this also has a tremendous impact on consistently economic development because of the lack of well-trained workers. In other words, not well-educated pupils would be the primary social burden.
In my conclusion, it is a good idea for the government to take priority over all type of schooling to develop the quality of citizens and the national economy.
- In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 73
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 48
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems? 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, for example, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23112635389 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8877366937 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174307301264 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570415033776 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412129347464 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947209782145 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663741904561 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.