Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books.
What is your opinion?
Critics among developed and developing countries have debated whether children should read entertaining books or educational books.
To begin with, enjoyable books are intuitively perceived as a key for children's mental growth. What this means is that entertainment books that contain colorful pictures and interesting contents can often trigger children's imagination, which can often bring positive development to their innovation. Compared to those who read educational books only, children who read story books are usually more cheerful and willing to share ideas when exploring the world. In addition, children are meant to enjoy their childhood without any pressure. Given that children will start their school life and study knowledge when they grow up, it is definitely unnecessary to force them to read educational books during their early stage of life. Therefore, children should read enjoyable sources of information when they are still young.
On the other hand, unequivocally serious books can bring many benefits to children. More specifically, it has been scientifically proven that human can absorb knowledge much more easier during childhood. By reading educational books, it is more efficient for children to learn the skills and develop logical thinking, paving a path for studying in prestigious schools which have high entry requirements. For example, children who love to read mathematics books can usually master Olympics Mathematics, which is a bonus when applying demanding academic institution. Moreover, another insight that must not be neglected, meanwhile, is the opportunity to stay with their parents. As reading educational books can sometimes be challenging, parents can take the chances to go through the serious books with them and therefore can build closer relationship with them.
In conclusion, both enjoyable and educational books play pivotal roles for children’s development. I would agree that children should alternatively read both types of books to enrich their childhood experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | sim_11 | 79 | view |
| 2018-12-02 | Rati | 25 | view |
| 2018-11-23 | sriram012985 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | namdev190@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000. 78
- The bar graph below shows the number of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? G 73
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past, what are the reasons for this? What do you think can be done for it? 89
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with?Give reasons for your answer and include any re 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...en that human can absorb knowledge much more easier during childhood. By reading educationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75907590759 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97894597049 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8156772949 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422736525759 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154651080225 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693092439138 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284822655153 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382508607681 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.