By and large, it is established beyond doubt that human beings are socialized and live in communications. In this regard, maintaining relationships is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on whether it is more beneficial that people should keep away from others to enhance their relationships or they should stay with others to have a good relationship. As for this writer’s opinion, I subscribe to the latter idea. In what follows, I will elaborate on the most crucial reasons to substantiate my perspective.
The first reason is that being together causes people to know and support each other. It is crystal clear that when individuals are in contact with each other constantly, they know the personality of the other one and they can help each other in difficult situations, emotionally or financially. As a case in point, I have been in touch with my friend, Sara until now. She knows my personality and my behaviors, perfectly. Not only does she respect me but also she helps me every time I am in need. If I had not been in contact with her for several years she would have never supported me in difficult situations. This example clear that the more strong two persons are in touch, the more strong friendship they will have.
Secondly, there is not enough time to be with lovely people in our life. It goes without saying that life is too short and individuals are too busy and they cannot spend a lot of time with others. However, people miss each other and if they do not visit them they will regret themselves in near future. By way of illustration, my friend’s mother passed away recently. He was so upset why he has never sent some simple gifts to her and made her happy; because she lived far from him. Unfortunately, he always blames himself for this sad occurrence. This example clearly illustrates how much important to be close to our important persons in our lives.
To put it briefly, as I mentioned above, one can infer that visiting persons, regularly is important for us to have a pure relationship. There is a couple of ideas which are worth to restating: firstly, people need each other to deal with arduous situations; secondly, they can prevent themselves from blaming and being regret in the future. As for this writer’s advice, I highly urge individuals to stay close to others they love them.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 34
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 60
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as for, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81265206813 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.823143618 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537712895377 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1789771853 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317552456969 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806441794149 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089372197449 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206505909688 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533378540874 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.