The following argument is flawed for numerous reasons. The argument makes a number of unwarranted assumptions regarding the success of a business corporation. Taken as a whole, these unstated assumptions render the argument highly suspect.
To begin with, the argument is based on a survey which doesn't always render an accurate result. The argument states that 88 per cent people have a positive response towards the opening of Hobby shop. Rather, It may happen that survey has been performed for less number of people. However, The argument doesn't provide any evidence of how many people participate in that survey. This survey would be more signified if the actual number of participants is mentioned.
Secondly, the argument states that the majority of the population of Grilldon is a retired person. It has been assumed that as they retire from a job, they have lots of time, though it doesn't make any definite idea about their hobbies. Maybe they have enough time, but that doesn't indicate they use their time for rendering hobby related tasks. Besides, they could leave the city and started to stay on rural which is free from all noises, pollutions, after retirement. So, their current stature of living information should be gleaned for further justification.
Thirdly, the argument states that Grilldon is in a region of the nation in which the hobby business has increased by 300 per cent during the past decade. This argument also leaves many other unanswered questions.First of all, this assumption is based on a survey, which doesn't always produce high accuracy. However, it would be more prudent if the argument provides the exact details of which way they have been surveyed and how many participants they have.
Finally, the argument claims without any warrant that southeastern Grilldon and Grilldon are similar. For one, the residence of Grilldon is wealthier, richer than those of southeastern Grilldon.Hence, this could explain the success of Grilldon Hobby Shop.if the argument states the similarity and equality of income level of both two places, this would strengthen the argument.
In conclusion, as the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to support the recommendation mentioned in the argument
- Repenomamus robustus (R.robustus) was not an active hunter 71
- Repenomamus robustus (R.robustus) was not an active hunter 78
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 66
- TOEFL T P O 5 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 55
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK
argument 4 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 366 350
No. of Characters: 1836 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.374 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.016 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.263 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.697 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.789 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.59 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the argument is based on a survey which doesnt always render an accurate result. The a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...number of people. However, The argument doesnt provide any evidence of how many people...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... job, they have lots of time, though it doesnt make any definite idea about their hobb...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... Maybe they have enough time, but that doesnt indicate they use their time for render...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
... leaves many other unanswered questions.First of all, this assumption is based on a s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... assumption is based on a survey, which doesnt always produce high accuracy. However, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...her than those of southeastern Grilldon.Hence, this could explain the success of Gril...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recommendation mentioned in the argument
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 359.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3008356546 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77189707264 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.684938146 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.70786347227 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823534037685 0.218282227539 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298524214453 0.0743258471296 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315734385335 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439824415855 0.128457276422 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317479193242 0.0628817314937 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.