Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history.
Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
In this contemporary time, more and more building from all over the world are being built by immensely. In this occurrence, some people consider that they should all be ruined, moreover they have to be deposed. In this essay, I completely disagree with this view as well as I will illustrate my opinion, how is it important to survive old buildings.
In my view, surviving old buildings are far more crucial because people, especially youths would pleasure these persistent buildings as exhibition for education. Moreover, one of the reason that advice people to sustain old building is that it can approve significant efficiency in researching its own history. For example, plenty of temple demolished in years of repression. However, one of the temple have survived because of its advantage of geographical. So, that it is still working, allowing us to visit and commemorate those, who plays crucial role for history of Mongolian religious. In contrast, if this building have not maintained lot of sutra would not stay with us.
Secondly, however it is important to maintain old buildings, history cannot keep up with progress. In addition, these 2 aspects are both distinctive from each other, past always pass, and progress always arrive from future and present. In instance, computer or other advancement are not emerged from history. Therefore history cannot lay with progress.
In conclusion, there have been a thought by people that old buildings should be replaced by new ones. Personally, it is logical thing to survive old buildings and build new ones in appropriate manner
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | Nur Aishah Budiman | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | Vikuns | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | arfaat | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | Bharat Goswami | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-26 | Enkhamgalan | 73 | view |
- Big salary is the most important thing in job satisfactionDo you agree or disagree? 78
- The two line graph compares between men and women for smoking rates in per 1000 person.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improve the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 61
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ined, moreover they have to be deposed. In this essay, I completely disagree with ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...it important to survive old buildings. In my view, surviving old buildings are fa...
^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun temple seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of temples'.
Suggestion: plenty of temples
...searching its own history. For example, plenty of temple demolished in years of repression. Howe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...vancement are not emerged from history. Therefore history cannot lay with progress. In c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18677042802 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83376962168 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0392814457 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320720992018 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104415614079 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951636635442 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202049812832 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980415806505 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.