Some people want scientific knowledge for the knowledge only whereas others want to practice this in particular field. Which one do you prefer?
Recently, the phenomenon of some people wants scientific knowledge for the knowledge only whereas others want to practice this in a particular field and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practice this in a particular field can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the scientific knowledge for the knowledge can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university researcher, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the scientific knowledge in a particular field might increase the consequences of vital needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the scientific knowledge in a particular field far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Is television a form of entertainment or information? discuss your views 88
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important? 80
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 88
- A competitive environment in school and university would bring excellence and need to be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 88
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics or the airplane. Why? Explain with examples 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67286245353 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26569716724 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.130783239 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414928775545 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132313072857 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155171858275 0.071462118173 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223150848897 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116059685988 0.0609392437508 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.