There is no shortage of debate about whether to be able to plan and organize aims in the current life or just to improvise. As far as I am concerned, the best thing people can do in these days is to enhance their planning skills because these are really necessary to fulfill dream goals. I cling to my outlook for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, naturally speaking, if someone goes straight toward their goals, they will achieve whatever they have thought before, besides, by creating a first mental framework of what you want to get in the future, you will be able to see the clean path. To clarify my point, let me take myself as an example, when I was in the high school, I made up my mind to be a granted student when I would go to the university. So, since then, I arranged some tiny daily things in a schedule such as making a research, going depth in topics, and having the best score in my exams, and after I finished each one I marked it. Thus, I achieved to earn a scholarship from the government of Ecuador so-called GAR.
Secondly, nowadays if you do not make a strong detailed list about what you want to get, you will not get it because the results are the consequences of what you have planned before, how you organized it, and what you did for that. For instance, my father wanted to be an astronaut when he was around fifteen years old, so he made their best following what he had enlisted to do in order to reach his goal. Later on, studying really hard, he finally was decorated as one of the best students in his class, and he got a great job just a little time after going out of college. Accordingly, I believe that with a strong schedule already planned and fulfilling it every day, you can get the best result possible.
To sum up, I strongly believe that in today life, it is the pivotal importance to planned and arrange your goals, because you will go directly to your objectives without distractions, and you will get the best end.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 80
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 78
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, finally, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39304812834 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41856854765 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0791189126 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.916666667 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.45110844103 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15724883246 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567698862458 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472606622275 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101934046223 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400205603234 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.