The article and the lecture both are argued about the humpback whales migration. The article states that even though there are several confusions about their migration, this particular whales having solutions and provide three reasons to support. However, the professor explained that although it is fascinating they are not convincing and he refutes the each of the author's opinion.
First, the article avers that kind of mammils are experts in the navigation with the help of starts because their brain having a complex structure. The professor opposes this point by saying this kind of the cognitive effect of the brain is common in the animals. He illustrated with the dog as an example, it is the common instinct and no particular connection to help in the moving from one place to another place.
Second, the passage climes that they move in a straight line because of the external objects like stars at night time. The professor contended this point by saying most of the animals are able to to do this and is not unique in whales. He explained that the animals having a biomagnetic property in their body is connected to the external earth magnetic to move forward.
Third, the passage posits that humpback is able to find the direction by moving to the surface of the water and put the head out of the water. The professor cast a doubt on this point by saying nothing to do with this sky hope. he mentioned that sharks are able to do for searching for the pray but this process is not possible in the whale migrations because they migrate in the morning time and they couldn't see any stars at the daytime.
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 85
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 80
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...nvincing and he refutes the each of the authors opinion. First, the article avers that...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...moving from one place to another place. Second, the passage climes that they mov...
^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... by saying most of the animals are able to to do this and is not unique in whales. He...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...aying nothing to do with this sky hope. he mentioned that sharks are able to do fo...
^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ey migrate in the morning time and they couldnt see any stars at the daytime.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71731448763 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43056634066 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501766784452 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9149262453 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281841287719 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096313536027 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606505644696 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164020077466 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497226089392 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.