The government is responsible for protecting a nation’s cultural identity. Thus, some people believe new buildings
should be built in traditional styles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The government is responsible for protecting a nation’s cultural identity. Thus, some people believe new buildings should be built in traditional styles. In my opinion, I completely with this view.
On the one hand, there are understandable reasons why new buildings shouldn't be built in traditional styles. The first reason is that the overpopulation is increasing more and more popularly in the big cities. That has led to problem of insufficient living land become more serious than ever. Therefore, to use the land efficiently, the government should construct high-rise buildings in modern styles, which can provide people with lots of space floor to live and work. Another reason is that constructing buildings in modern and unique designs and equipped with advanced furnitures will partly make a professional and active look for a city or town. As a result, this will provides citizens with a higher standard of living.
On the other hand, instead of spending money on new construction built in traditional styles, government should try to preserve those that already exist. The old buildings represent both cultural and historical values of a country, some of them even become the witness of the history of a country, it is obvious that financial support to these building is very important to preserve them. Because they are live documents for educating young people about culture and tradition of previous generation in the past, thereby helping them have a respectful attitude to their history. Therefore, the authorities should try to restore these precious heritages, which maybe the best way to protect a nation’s cultural identity and keep them alive longer.
In conclusion, I believe that it is unnecessary to construct new buildings in traditional styles because they should be built in modern styles to address the overpopulation, besides government should try to preserve those that already exist instead of spending money on new construction built in traditional styles.
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums They should spend more money on medical care and education Do you agree or disagree 95
- More and more student are choosing to move to other countries to study their higher education. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 78
- Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...nderstandable reasons why new buildings shouldnt be built in traditional styles. The fir...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... a city or town. As a result, this will provides citizens with a higher standard of livi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try to preserve those that already exist instead of spending money on new constru...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, look, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38412698413 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99981690883 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520634920635 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4839179911 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334353336953 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130885533559 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120798093007 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273980954491 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205498390699 0.056905535591 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.