Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Investment on some fundamental issues must be more considered like medical, training, business and all related aspects. Although, it is a huge and momentous duty for each government, I partially agree with taking help from more power countries.
It is apparent that some under developing countries could not deal with their problems. Especially if they have lack of good managers. As all of us are mankind, helping who need to boost in different situations is human-duty. Exceptionally, in some areas which is referred to their principle matters like health, education and trade. Moreover of humanity, this kind of help would have widespread effect on condition of other countries. The enormous amount of population of these backward countries emigrate to various sides of the world due to shortage of different properties like jobs, health or education facilities.
Different cultures could make problems for receivers of immigrants. So it is better to find the root of troubles.
On the other hands, these aids must not be perceived as responsibilities by developing's politicians. They must organize all these supportive actions beside their basic programs on crucial areas which is said before.
In conclusion, supporting under developing countries is involved in humanity. While these co-operations must form in an obvious frames.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...tters like health, education and trade. Moreover of humanity, this kind of help would ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ping countries is involved in humanity. While these co-operations must form in an obv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'frame'?
Suggestion: frame
...e co-operations must form in an obvious frames.
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rations must form in an obvious frames.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50724637681 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04930046584 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1089412415 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4285714286 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119856052567 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371897128656 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385750555276 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592463682815 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342154000361 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.