It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that learning about the history of their own countries is more important than that of the world. While the importance of local history is undeniable, I would argue that world history subjects also play an equally important role in school curriculums for children.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it is necessary for children to learn about local history. First, local history lessons provide schoolchildren with insight into the local historical value, which fosters a sense of belongings and pride in each child. For example, studying to understand how their earlier generations found and made sacrificed for the freedom, youngsters would appropriate the liberty that they enjoy today. Second, because various aspects of customs are scrutinized via learning local history, students could not only preserve but transfer the best one to generations to come. If students do not understand their historical value enough, the customs stemming from historical event might fade away.
However, I believe that studying the history of other nations is as essential as that of their own nations. The first reason is that due to the modern trend towards globalization, schoolchildren need to have certain knowledge of other ethnic groups and different traditions. This could be achieved easier if students know more about the past development of other countries in the world. Additionally, armed with a broader perspective thanks to the process of learning world history, children could have an overview of how close international historical events connected to local history. In this way of learning, children would understand history more deeply and thoroughly.
In conclusion, while local history is crucial for children to learn, I believe that there are equal benefits in accessing world history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Darshnatrivedi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | nagakhoa | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | IWTA80 | 73 | view |
- Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 89
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilites. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- it is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42456140351 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80488076566 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564912280702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1619658092 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364883528671 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130081097053 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868452953334 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243989977733 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637344655269 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.