"In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The surest part of success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership and it is essential. And in some cases it is not because if well settle business is continuously developing because of leader’s skills and knowledge, then it is not essential to step down the leader after five year, if leader has been step down after five year it’s ramification on business will be harmful. To prevent from the stagnant it is essential to change the leader like in American democracy the new leader is elected after eight year regardless on personal skill for development of the nation similarly in India also, by the people referendum a leader is elected after five year. It is essential that new leader should be elected but by studying the situation otherwise it will harmful and there will be no beneficial of new leader in any field.
It is very important that in every field experienced, knowledgeable as well as well-educated leader should be there, consider in business if experienced leader is step down it will take ephemeral time to plummet the business for example, the pioneer of APPLE computer i.e Steve Jobs, if he has been step down from business after five year, it’s consequence were very harmful and possibility that it may not discover only.
Let in any field like business, political, government there are always certain possibilities, if leader is not change the continuously up’s and down’s will be there in particular field, otherwise leader has been step down after five year, as coin has two side there will be thrive in the field otherwise the particular field will get collapse. So that depending upon the situation the leader should step down.
In some case lead harmful because of revitalization, for the reason it is better that the experienced and knowledgeable leader should be there in any field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | p30kh40 | 66 | view |
| 2018-10-09 | ROHIT KHAIRNAR | 50 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | BigSize2Shots | 66 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | Jungysh | 75 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 40
- "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- The nation should required all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Scandals may be political, social, financial, religious offenses which disrespect morality and brings dispute in the community. scandals are useful because it focus over attention on immorality activities or sinful activity and bring changes in the attitu 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the particular field will get collapse. So that depending upon the situation the leader...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, for example, in particular, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05501618123 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90238763098 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443365695793 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.610114978 60.3974514979 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.25 118.986275619 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.625 23.4991977007 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.21951772744 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25490722232 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154571590047 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102776645107 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160057582975 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054432132505 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 14.1392134831 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.