About the planning and organization bring a controversial question. Some people believe that those skills are crucial for being successful. Nevertheless, others think that planning and organization are not necessary factors of life. From my point of view, because this society is complex, the ability to plan and organize do not really fit with it for the following aspects.
Above all, because nowadays things change abruptly, the plan does not work properly originally. Moreover, society is changing into a busy mood day by day and because of this people take it for granted to cancel a meeting if it is not necessary. Also, the sickness, the traffic, and other obstacles come without telling us which break the plan at all. From my own experience, when I plan my whole week or a month to do things, I actually could do only twenty to twenty-five percent of it. Because my plan does not include sudden decisions and some event that is forgotten. I think it is better to plan only a few hours or a day but it is not that mandatory.
Another reason is, the planning only takes a time but not efficient. In other words, I think planning is only a waste of time. To plan long-term activities requires much time, more than a day. Also, if something deviates from the plan, the whole thing will turn into a trash. Because all the activities planned were dependent on each other in order to be beneficial. For instance, a student has planned a trip into a foreign country and imagine the struggle appears such as lack of money. Even though how much time spent to plan the trip carefully, he or she has to cancel it because a student has no other options.
All in all, even though a person is adult or not, planning requires a complicated skill. Also, the cons of planning things outweigh the pros.
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support 60
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...o a busy mood day by day and because of this people take it for granted to cancel a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hole thing will just turn into a trash. Because all the activities planned were depende...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, as to, for instance, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56481481481 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51093288453 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552469135802 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5142873991 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8421052632 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180541410095 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577511355775 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462627079328 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119404587202 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499519859759 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.