Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
There are a main attitude which believe we could decrease the traffic and also solve pollution problems with increasing the petrol price. Although this solution has been able to remedy the described situation partly, I think it could not be appropriate and perpetual. In fact we should consider the better alternative approach, which will be explained.
With growing the expenditures of energy conduits, the use culture will never be institutionalized. In other Word, it has been approved that imposed manners, hardly could change the populace’s outlook, unless, they have been aware about the best way. In addition, rarely is this solution effective for the rich why they are able to afford this prices, and just make poor and average people under force. In fact if we are to pass a law, we should consider all impact and aspect, without waste the entitlement of some people.
there are many other solutions which could be applied to solve the environmental pollution and crowded traffic. First of all, it is better to decrease the expenditure of public transportation from one side, and also try to grow the volume and quality of them from other side. In addition we should struggle to build a better culture instead of spreading the enforcement. Moreover for coping with pollution, we should try to take an advance technology in order to apply the safer and healthier energies. On the other hand with expanding the roads and streets, solve the worries about traffic and congestion.
In conclusion, I could infer, we should apply cultural way and also advanced technology to remedy a situation related to pollution and traffic, instead of imposed solution such as increasing the prices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 91
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is rarely
... aware about the best way. In addition, rarely is this solution effective for the rich wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ke poor and average people under force. In fact if we are to pass a law, we should...
^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...and quality of them from other side. In addition we should struggle to build a better cu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e instead of spreading the enforcement. Moreover for coping with pollution, we should tr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12454212454 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79555102429 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.574257538 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.615384615 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136332204004 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520436326124 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438274274204 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909439791483 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237111212664 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.