Some people say that seeing ancient objects in a museum can give the public a unique Awareness of history others say that modern media such as filmsor talks on the internet provider more effective way for the public to learn about history history .
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Museums are the only way by which all things can be preserved. A few people believe that one can enhance their knowledge about History while seeing the old objects in a museum whilst other argue that media is a better way to create awareness about history. I would discuss both views with my own perception.
On the one hand, in the museum,people can see the historical objects which develop their interest about history. With these objects, they come to know about a How their ancestors live,what type of clothes they used to wear, people come to know about their living standard and how they used to live without any facilities. Hence, it enhance their knowledge about history. Secondly, in museums, they see the objects in real but on television, they do not give much attention to that things. So, in museums, they can touch the objects, they can clicked photographs which will develop their interest in them.
On the other hand, some people cannot visit in museums as museums are not located everywhere but they can this on TV, internet and on some other things. So, TV and internet also play significance role. Moreover, all types of historical objects are not available in a single museum but on internet one can watch every type of object and can read about an important role in enhancing the knowledge of public.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate that it is unfair to support or oppose anyone both have their own significance but I still prefer Museum as they provide live experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | SARTAJjammu | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-14 | paramveersingh | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 84
- Some people think that schools should teach students to understand about right, wrong and good behaviour instead of this being only parents’ responsibility. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people say that seeing ancient objects in a museum can give the public a unique Awareness of history others say that modern media such as filmsor talks on the internet provider more effective way for the public to learn about history history.Discuss 56
- The development of technology changes the way people interact with each other In which way does it change the types of relationship between people Is this a positive or negative development 93
- Some people say that working couple must equally share the household responsibilities in all cultures across the world. Howevere, others disagree with this statement. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...tion. On the one hand, in the museum,people can see the historical objects which de...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , what
...to know about a How their ancestors live,what type of clothes they used to wear, peop...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
... live without any facilities. Hence, it enhance their knowledge about history. Secondly...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'click'
Suggestion: click
...s, they can touch the objects, they can clicked photographs which will develop their in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80384615385 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49440498176 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515384615385 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7566244584 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232004180962 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896618490122 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786439646228 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145382258872 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839771161216 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.